The In-situ measurement of background ionizing radiation of Centre of Life hospital Bori in Khana Local Government Area of Rivers state of Nigeria has been carried out. Digilert-200 Radiation meters was utilized in measurement of background ionizing radiation and Global Positioning System (Garmin 765) was used in measuring coordinates of the sampling points. Fifteen (15) sampling points were arbitrarily selected within the diagnostics centre. The results of the BIR outdoor and indoor varies from 0.010 - 0.015 with mean of 0.013 mRhr-1. Absorbed Dose rate varies from 87.0 -130.5 nGy/yr with mean of 114.3 nGy/yr and 116.0 nGy/yr for outdoor and indoor. AEDE varies from 0.107 – 0.160 with mean of 0.140 mSv/yr and 0.142 mSv/yr and Excess life cancer risk varies from 0.37×10-3 – 0.56×10-3 with mean of 0.50×10-3 and 0.50×10-3 for outdoor and indoor respectively. The obtained values for BIR of Centre of Life Hospital Ltd was within recommended standard limit of 0.013mR/h. The obtained result for AEDE was within the recommended safe limit. The obtained results of ELCR and the ADR are all higher than the recommended standard of 0.29 x 10-3 and 84.0 nGy/h respectively. The result of radiation dose to different body organ shows that the testes have the highest radiation percentage for outdoor and indoor respectively.
Published in | Nuclear Science (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ns.20240903.12 |
Page(s) | 61-70 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ionizing Radiation, Radiation Monitor, Absorbed Dose Rate (ADR), X-ray, Utilization and Radioactivity
[1] | Richardson D. B., Cardis E. (2015). Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionizing radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS) BMJ. 2015; 351 |
[2] | Orji. E. Chikwendu, Benedict Eke. C., Amokom K. Chijioke, Nwoko O. Emmanuel and Okafor C. Cornelius (2016). Evaluation of Background Ionizing Radiation Level in some X-ray centers in Owrri Imo State Nigeria. International Journal of Current Research. Vol.8, Issue03, pp 28527-28529. |
[3] | United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR, 2010). Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to General Assembly, with annexes. New York. |
[4] | Avwiri G. O. (2011). Radiation the Good, the Bad and the Ugly in our Environment. An Inaugural Lecture 79th Series University of Port Harcourt. |
[5] | Eshiett Peter, Joseph Dlama Zira, Egga Anita, Matthew Abubakar, Abdullahi Mundi, Kpaku Goriya (2017). Assessment of Background Radiation Levels at the Radiology Department of a Tertiary Hospital in North-central Nigeria. Journal of the association of radiographer of Nigeria. SSN: 1115-7976, Vol. 29. |
[6] | U. L. Anekwe1 and S. O. Ibe. (2017). Estimation of Radiation Risk Due to Exposure to Terrestrial Radiation. Archives of Current Research International 9(4): 1-10, 2017; Article no. ACRI.36318 ISSN: 2454-7077. |
[7] | United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR 2000). Exposures from Natural Radiation Sources, Report to the General Assembly, United Nations, New York. Annex-b, 140. |
[8] | Upton, A. C. (2003). The state of the art in the 1990’s: NCRP Report No. 136 on the scientific bases for linearity in the dose-response relationship for ionizing radiation. Health Physics, 85(1), 15-22. |
[9] | Impact of Local Government Corruption and Mismanagement on Primary Education and Primary Health care in Rivers State. Human Right Watch. Retrieved 17/7/2007. |
[10] | Norman, A and Kagan, A. R (1997). “Point/Counterpoint: Radiation Doses in Radiation Therapy are not safe”. Med. Phys. 24(11): 1710-1713. |
[11] | Muhammad R. Saeed, U. R, Muhammade, B, Wajid A, Iftikhar, A, Khursheed A. L, Kha; id, and Matiullah (2014). Evaluation of Excess life Time Cancer risk from gammer dose rate in Jhelium Valley. Journal of Radiation Research and applied Sciences 7: 29-35. |
[12] | ICRP, Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: Annals of the ICRP Publication 103, 2007 (pp. 2-4). Elsevier. |
[13] | Esendu N. B, Avwiri G. O, Ononugbo C. P. (2021). Evaluation of background ionizing radiation of nembe clusters oil and gas areas, Bayelsa State. International Journal of Innovation Environmental Studies Research. 2021; 9(2): 33-43. |
[14] | Darwish DAE, Abul-Nasr KTM, El-Khayatt AM (2015). DinhChau, N., Dulinski, M., Jotilowski, P., Nowak, J., Rozanski, K., Sleziak, M. and Wachniew, P. 2011 Natural radioactivity in ground water- A review. Isot. Environ. Health Study. 47(4): 415-437. |
[15] | ICRP (International Commission on Radiological Protection (2012) compendium of dose coefficients base on ICRP Publication 60. ICRP Publication119. Ann. ICRP41 (Suppl.). |
[16] | United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR (2002). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annex, New York. |
[17] | Bubu A. and Ononugbo C. P. (2023). Measurement of Outdoor and Indoor Background Ionizing Radiation of O. B. Lulu Briggs Health Center, University of Port Harcourt, Choba, Rivers State, Nigeria. Asian Journal of Physical and Chemical Sciences Volume 11, Issue 3, Page 21-29, 2023; Article no. AJOPACS.101846 ISSN: 2456-7779. |
[18] | Agbalagba EO, Nenuwe ON, Egarievwe S. GIS mapping of BIR levels around fossil fuel and gas dispensing stations and assessment of their radiological risk implications. Geological Behavior. 2020; 4(2): 54-62. Available: |
[19] | Nwankwo L, Adeoti D, Folarin A. Ionizing radiation measurements and assay of corresponding dose rate around bottling and pharmaceutical facilities in Ilorin, Nigeria. Journal of Science and Technology (Ghana). 2015; 34(2): 84. Available: |
[20] | Bension ID, Ugbede FO. Measurement of background ionizing radiation and evaluation of lifetime cancer risk in highly populated motor parks in Enugu City, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Applied Physics (IOSR-JAR). 2018; 10(3): 77-82. Available: |
APA Style
Abel, N. A., Legborsi, B. L. (2024). Radiological Health Risk of Exposure to Gamma Radiation in Private Diagnostic Center in Khana Local Government Area Rivers State, Nigeria. Nuclear Science, 9(3), 61-70. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ns.20240903.12
ACS Style
Abel, N. A.; Legborsi, B. L. Radiological Health Risk of Exposure to Gamma Radiation in Private Diagnostic Center in Khana Local Government Area Rivers State, Nigeria. Nucl. Sci. 2024, 9(3), 61-70. doi: 10.11648/j.ns.20240903.12
@article{10.11648/j.ns.20240903.12, author = {Nwii Abayiga Abel and Biibalo Livinus Legborsi}, title = {Radiological Health Risk of Exposure to Gamma Radiation in Private Diagnostic Center in Khana Local Government Area Rivers State, Nigeria }, journal = {Nuclear Science}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {61-70}, doi = {10.11648/j.ns.20240903.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ns.20240903.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ns.20240903.12}, abstract = {The In-situ measurement of background ionizing radiation of Centre of Life hospital Bori in Khana Local Government Area of Rivers state of Nigeria has been carried out. Digilert-200 Radiation meters was utilized in measurement of background ionizing radiation and Global Positioning System (Garmin 765) was used in measuring coordinates of the sampling points. Fifteen (15) sampling points were arbitrarily selected within the diagnostics centre. The results of the BIR outdoor and indoor varies from 0.010 - 0.015 with mean of 0.013 mRhr-1. Absorbed Dose rate varies from 87.0 -130.5 nGy/yr with mean of 114.3 nGy/yr and 116.0 nGy/yr for outdoor and indoor. AEDE varies from 0.107 – 0.160 with mean of 0.140 mSv/yr and 0.142 mSv/yr and Excess life cancer risk varies from 0.37×10-3 – 0.56×10-3 with mean of 0.50×10-3 and 0.50×10-3 for outdoor and indoor respectively. The obtained values for BIR of Centre of Life Hospital Ltd was within recommended standard limit of 0.013mR/h. The obtained result for AEDE was within the recommended safe limit. The obtained results of ELCR and the ADR are all higher than the recommended standard of 0.29 x 10-3 and 84.0 nGy/h respectively. The result of radiation dose to different body organ shows that the testes have the highest radiation percentage for outdoor and indoor respectively. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Radiological Health Risk of Exposure to Gamma Radiation in Private Diagnostic Center in Khana Local Government Area Rivers State, Nigeria AU - Nwii Abayiga Abel AU - Biibalo Livinus Legborsi Y1 - 2024/11/13 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ns.20240903.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ns.20240903.12 T2 - Nuclear Science JF - Nuclear Science JO - Nuclear Science SP - 61 EP - 70 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-4346 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ns.20240903.12 AB - The In-situ measurement of background ionizing radiation of Centre of Life hospital Bori in Khana Local Government Area of Rivers state of Nigeria has been carried out. Digilert-200 Radiation meters was utilized in measurement of background ionizing radiation and Global Positioning System (Garmin 765) was used in measuring coordinates of the sampling points. Fifteen (15) sampling points were arbitrarily selected within the diagnostics centre. The results of the BIR outdoor and indoor varies from 0.010 - 0.015 with mean of 0.013 mRhr-1. Absorbed Dose rate varies from 87.0 -130.5 nGy/yr with mean of 114.3 nGy/yr and 116.0 nGy/yr for outdoor and indoor. AEDE varies from 0.107 – 0.160 with mean of 0.140 mSv/yr and 0.142 mSv/yr and Excess life cancer risk varies from 0.37×10-3 – 0.56×10-3 with mean of 0.50×10-3 and 0.50×10-3 for outdoor and indoor respectively. The obtained values for BIR of Centre of Life Hospital Ltd was within recommended standard limit of 0.013mR/h. The obtained result for AEDE was within the recommended safe limit. The obtained results of ELCR and the ADR are all higher than the recommended standard of 0.29 x 10-3 and 84.0 nGy/h respectively. The result of radiation dose to different body organ shows that the testes have the highest radiation percentage for outdoor and indoor respectively. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -